Wed, 18 Jun 2008
Frugal Driving
Even before fuel prices started going mad I was trying to drive economically. My commute
is about 30 miles of motorway and 10 of London dual-carriageways. That generally takes anything from 60
to 90 minutes with odd exception of much longer when the traffic gets totally messed up. So at best I
am averaging 40mph. I drive a 2004 Vauxhall Zafira 1.9 Turbodiesel. The official fuel consumption figures
are Urban: 37.2mpg, Extra Urban 55.4mpg, Combined 47.1mpg. The only way I have to check mine is by
calculating from how many miles I get from a full tank to when I when I next fill it and I was getting
around 47mpg. I try to keep a light right foot with minimal braking and gentle acceleration. I was doing
65-70mpg on the motorway and keeping to limits in town.
Recently I have been trying to improve on that. The main change is going down to 60-65mph. I still go
over that if I need to overtake and not hold up the rest of the traffic too much. Going up hills I may
slow a bit more. The result has been figures of 50 and 51mpg on the last two tanks. That is saving me
nearly a penny per mile. The thing is that it probably doesn't make much difference to my journey time.
For a fair bit of the motorway travel I can't even get up to 60mph. Those who do overtake me will just reach
one of the several pinch points a bit sooner. So they may save a couple of minutes, but that's no big deal.
I find driving a bit slower less stressful. I don't have to do too much overtaking. I try to go slightly
quicker than the trucks so as not to slow them up, but also pass a few cars.
I would like to do even better, but that may require more radical methods. The so-called
hypermilers go to extremes like coasting with the
engine off and making major modifications to their cars. I would be prepared to invest some money
on car parts if the payback time was reasonable. What I could really do with is a computer as featured on
many cars that tells you the mpg at any given time so that I could adjust my speed, but I'm not sure I
want to go much slower. I could try removing the roof bars that serve no real purpose, but I don't know
if it would make a measurable difference. Any suggestions?
Another aspect of my driving is trying to help the general traffic flow. The first rule is good lane
discipline. Often I see the overtaking lane full and the middle empty. Then someone will take a chance on
speeding up there. I try to keep things moving at junctions. When it's busy then any dawdling can mean
many people missing a change of the lights and spending more time burning fuel whilst getting nowhere.
When the traffic starts speeding up after a slow patch I try to get away as quick as I safely can. Others
leave huge gaps and so don't help the jam to clear. I'll often move into a slower lane where there is a big
gap and let others get past me. I doubt that I make much difference, but if more people drove a bit less
selfishly then it could.
The biggest difference I can make is by driving less. I am trying to do this by working from home more.
In my line of work that is easy to do and saves me 2.5 hours of daily travelling. My employer is being fairly
accommodating about this.
We hear a lot about carbon footprints and there are various sites that will calculate yours.
The Carbon Account uses details of your mileage, meter readings
and flight details to give a visual impression of how you are doing in certain aspects. I've just started
using it. It's scary how big a contribution even a flight within Europe can make. I've done a lot of flights for
work in the last few years, but not so much lately. We might do one a year for family holidays, but will look
at other options such as the train. We recently took the train to Edinburgh and it was very convenient apart
from a bit of waiting around. It was quicker than driving and no more expensive. Flying would have involved getting
to and from the airports and probably not saved much time.
[
21:40] | [
] |
comments (0) |
G
Sun, 10 Feb 2008
Wishy Washy
A while back I started having problems with the windscreen washers on my Zafira. Something was
blocking it. I found that I could pull the pipe off the washer and blow down it. That sometimes cleared
it, but not permanently. Then one time I went to do this and snapped a bit off the nozzle. I just got a
new one that cost all of UKP2.30, but fitting it was not easy. Basically you have to destroy the old one
by hacking bits off it as it pushes into a hole, but will not come back out. I couldn't find any details
of this on-line, so perhaps this information will help someone else.
I'm guessing that the blockage was due to something in the reservoir, but that is fairly inaccessible
in the wing of the car. I thought I would fix that by siphoning it out. I managed to get some lovely bright
green screenwash in my gob, but managed using a bit of hosepipe. I did it a few times for good measure and,
fingers crossed, it seems to be okay now. So it cost me a couple of quid, a chunk of my time and the skin
of a couple of knuckles. I just don't have the time and money to take it to a mechanic.
I don't think too much of interest has been going on in my life lately. I have had some use of the Wii
wireless to send things back and forth to our friends. My computer audio problems persist. I think I will
have to reinstall Kubuntu and accept that I will have to set a load of stuff up again, but at least
most user settings survive as my home partition will still be there. The problem tends to be finding
a spare few hours to do it all.
[
21:20] | [
] |
comments (0) |
G
Thu, 19 Apr 2007
Catch the car crooks
According to the BBC less than half of
drivers caught on speed and traffic light cameras get fines and points. A third cannot be traced.
Surely it is more important to catch that third than to just put up more cameras. If they can
get away with speeding then they are likely to not be paying insurance or road tax either.
I begrudge having to subsidise them. I bet that a fair few have false number plates and so
someone else may get the blame for their offences. Perhaps if they are detected more than once
on a given route then the police could go out and trap them. The roads are dangerous enough
without these idiots.
I've never been done for speeding myself and am unlikely to be as I don't speed. I'm more
concerned about cutting my fuel consumption so I drive up and down the A1(M) at around
65mph. A lot of people overtake me, but I still pass a few and it all evens out at the regular
slow points, so I don't think it costs me more than a couple of minutes on my journey. It's
generally less stressful than trying to drive fast. If you want thrills then get them away
from the public roads.
I've just seen a separate story about
turning pig fat into diesel. Another crap idea from the oil industry and not appealing to a
non-meateater like myself. The meat industry itself uses vast amounts of energy and the animals
emit huge quantities of greenhouse gases. The whole biofuels from plants idea is not viable either.
We should be growing food to feed the world rather than to keep our cars going and there just isn't
enough land to grow enough fuel for everyone.
[
22:07] | [
] |
comments (0) |
G
Wed, 20 Dec 2006
Haven't the Foggiest
There's been a little bit of mist/fog about in the mornings this week. Some people seem to think
that this means they must have their fog lights on. The Highway Code is
quite clear on this. Fog lights (front and rear)
are only to be used when visibility is 'seriously reduced', i.e. when people other drivers would not
be able to see you clearly otherwise. I have emailed the local radio stations in the vain home that
they might mention this on their traffic reports when they are saying there is fog about.
Don't get me started on those people who always have their front fogs on to try and intimidate others.
And what is it with those who drive around with front fogs and side lights? Trying to make up for their
general dimness?
[
09:48] | [
] |
comments (0) |
G
Fri, 08 Dec 2006
Clamped
One of the pet hates of motorists over the last few years has been the use of
wheel clamps and the extortionate fees charged for getting them removed. Up until
now we have been unaffected, but this week it caught up with us.
My other half went shopping in Stevenage with a friend. They parked in the free
carpark by the cinema, intending to use one of the restaurants there later. When they
got back with the shopping they had been clamped. They obviously look out for people
parking and walking away then pounce, without giving those people any opportunity to
remove their cars. Of course they charged a lot to remove it. As it's private land there
doesn't seem to be much chance of appealing. It would be easier against a council.
I can appreciate that carpark owners do not want their spaces taken up by people who
are not spending their money there, but this response seems to be totally out of
proportion. We will not be going to that cinema or the nearby restaurants again in the
near future and will let them know this. Bedford and Hatfield are not much further away.
If either of my readers is likely to go there then I hope they heed this warning.
I needed to get that out of my system. Meanwhile, I've managed to read a fair few books
this year. I've been inspired to re-read my Douglas Adams collection. I've just completed
the Hitchhiker 'trilogy'. I'm not really reviewing them, but I'm logging them all on
my book list. The Amazon
links will all contribute to the school if you use them. I'm
hoping that my affiliate links will raise a few quid from Xmas shopping.
[
14:36] | [
] |
comments (0) |
G
Thu, 20 Apr 2006
Money to Burn
I saw my first £1 Litre of diesel this week. 100.9p at the Hendon Way BP.
I suspect they have been trying to delay going to triple digit pence, but had to give in. I filled up for a penny
less elsewhere. I could have got cheaper if I could have waited, but I was getting very low on fuel. I don't
generally drive further for cheaper fuel, but usually hang on if I know it's cheaper further along my
route.
While I'm on the subject of prices, why do we have to have .9 or .99 prices everywhere? Are people really
fooled into thinking it's so much cheaper? For a TV to cost £499.99 rather than £500 is silly, but for a
magazine to cost £3.99 is a pain as you just end up with loads of pennies if you pay cash. If it's less than
1% of the price I just don't care about the odd penny. With fuel you are dealing with tenths of a penny.
I expect the argument will be that nobody wants to be first to make the change.
The fact that everything is priced at these artificial numbers shows how contrived pricing is. Prices are
rounded up to whatever it is though the market will bear. Some internet retailers are going against this
and pricing at the minimum they can sustain as they know people are using comparison sites to find the
lowest possible price. I buy most major items on-line these days in order to save a few quid and to avoid
having to trail around all the shops.
[
08:20] | [
] |
comments (0) |
G
Wed, 08 Mar 2006
More on the Loremo
When I looked at this car
before
I wondered how you got in as there was no sign of a door. Now some
new pictures
from a car show have appeared that show how it works. The whole front of the car lifts up.
Like some sports cars I've been in it may require some gymnastics to get in. You can also see that the
+2 seats are accessed from the rear and face backwards. It's a novel way to fit them in.
I'm so intruiged that I have subscribed to their mailing list to see how things develop.
[
12:45] | [
] |
comments (0) |
G
Mon, 27 Feb 2006
At last, the car of tomorrow
For many years I have been frustrated by the motor industry not making any major
improvements in fuel economy. At best the average car might be a few percent better
than one for ten years ago. Our diesel Zafira manages up to 50mpg (5.5 l/100km). That's
about 30% better than our old Rover, but probably largely down to being a diesel.
Even the much celebrated
Toyota Prius
can only manage something around the mid sixties, depending on how and where you drive.
If you drive mostly motorway it would not be that high as the petrol engine would
have to run all the time.
Today I read about an intruiging car from a company called
Loremo. They seem to be a small company
in Germany who are developing a car that can manage a staggering 180mpg (1.5 l/100km)!
Unlike some of the concept cars you see this looks reasonably practical with capacity
for up to four passengers, but I expect those in the back would not have much room.
The economy comes from using a small (15 kW / 20 HP) diesel engine in a very light
(450 kg) package with very good aerodynamics. Obviously it's not going to be the
quickest car on the road (0-100km/h in a leisurely 20s), but they reckon it can get to
160km/h eventually, which is quicker than anyone should be travelling on UK roads.
There's an alternative model with a much more powerful engine that manages about half the
economy for those who feel the need. Both are reasonably priced, but will not be available before
2009.It's in the same sort of ballpark as the
Smart ForFour,
but weighs about half as much.
It will be interesting to see if they get to market on schedule, if at all. Maybe the technology
will filter up to cars in general and we can all look forward to using less of the increasingly
expensive go-juice.
I'm making an effort to use metric measures at the moment. It's difficult as so many aspects
of motoring in the UK are stuck in the imperial age even if we buy our fuel in Litres. Changing all
our distance and speed signs would be a major undertaking and would cause much confusion.
I recently read an
interesting site on the history and statistics of which side of the road various countries
drive on. That's another thing that's unlikely to change in a hurry.
[
21:41] | [
] |
comments (0) |
G
Wed, 14 Sep 2005
Burn baby, burn
Five years on we have another round of fuel protests in the UK. The current
prices may be partly due to
Hurricane
Katrina, but they were creeping up anyway. So now we see people queing for petrol
everywhere. I filled up the Zafira on Monday, but only when I found an Esso with no queue.
I should be okay for a week or so now.
You would think with prices nearing £1/Litre people might slow down a bit to use less, but that
does not seem to be the case. I'm trying to reduce my usage a bit by keeping my speed down a little
and being more aware of how much pressure I use on the accelerator. We will see if I can improve on
my usual figures of around 48mpg. I like the fact that I can easily get over 500 miles on a tank.
I'm still waiting for affordable cars that give much better economy. Maybe the latest hybrid
cars like the Prius will get more popular if
fuel prices keep rising. I know most of the UK price is tax, but that's unlikely to change much.
My theory about people speeding is that they do it because it is easy and they are unlikely to
get caught. Modern cars can cruise at high speed and are so quiet that it doesn't feel that fast.
You have to go really fast for it to feel exciting. Don't get me started on those noisy exhausts
that seem to get fitted to every 'hot hatch'. I've even seem them on people carriers.
Speed cameras do not make much difference as
most people know where they are or they buy gadgets to tell them. I wonder if there will ever be
widespread use of technology to check your speed over long distances, e.g. sets of cameras on the
motorway that log your registration number and make sure you don't get to the next one too
quickly. It's all possible, but there are implications for privacy when everyone's number is logged.
I just find it ironic that a lot of the time speeding makes very little difference to journey time.
On my commute I often catch up with drivers who zoomed past me earlier and have hit traffic. I'll
keep driving for economy.
[
08:35] | [
] |
comments (0) |
G
Thu, 03 Mar 2005
It gets worse
Going home last night took nearly two hours. It started with a broken
down car on the NCR, then the usual roadworks with added snow for
interest.
This morning I heard on the radio that the M25 was shut and traffic was
diverting via the A1, so decided to avoid the area and use the M1. That
ended up taking 1.5 hours.
Why do all the roadworks have to be done at once?
[
13:12] | [
] |
comments (0) |
G
[1]
2 >>